论文部分内容阅读
通常,人们仅仅把普特南著名的“缸中之脑”论证当做是一种反怀疑主义的论证,然而这将大大低估其价值。它是一个先验论证,涉及思想或指称的可能性条件,进而拷问在思想与世界之间是否存在一种截然两分的界限。总而言之,该论证具有深厚的哲学底蕴和价值,它为开辟实用主义的先验路径提供了可能,因此从先验的角度来理解,我们能够把它的真正特性凸显出来。
In general, Putin’s mere “brain in the cylinder” argument is merely an anti-skeptical argument, however, which will greatly underestimate its value. It is a transcendental argument that deals with the conditions of possibility of thought or allegation and then questions whether there is a dichotomy between thought and the world. All in all, the argument has a deep philosophical foundation and value. It provides the possibility of opening up an a priori path to pragmatism. Therefore, from an a priori perspective, we can highlight its true features.