针对抗州市实行奖金制度的情况,陈可怡同志在《浙江经济》1989年第3期上撰写了《奖金作用力削弱因素的三种形态》一文。文章说:1.奖金的概念畸形。奖金本应是对职工超额劳动部分的报酬。但实际上,目前在职工概念中并没有把它当作一种超额劳动的奖励,而是当作工资的一个不可分削的组成部分,或者当作生活费用的津贴。这就抹煞了工资与奖金之间的根本区别,奖金激励因素的拉力作用被埋没。这种状况,表现在范围上,企业基本上是对百分之百的职工实行奖励。在条件上,奖金与工作任务严重脱节。在数额上,各企业不顾自身经济效益好坏和劳动生产率高低,巧立名目,盲目攀比,使奖金的发放已达到难以控制的地步。2.奖金的作用变形。奖金本具有柔性和“活”的 In response to the implementation of the bonus system in the city of Kangzhou, Comrade Chen Keyi wrote “Three Patterns of the Weakening Effect of Bonuses” in the third issue of Zhejiang Economy in 1989. The article said: 1. The concept of bonus is abnormal. The bonus should have been paid for the excess part of the employee. In reality, however, it is not currently considered as a reward for excess labor in the employee concept, but as an inseparable component of wages or as a subsidy for living expenses. This wipes out the fundamental difference between wages and bonuses, and the pull of bonus incentives is buried. This situation is manifested in the scope. Enterprises are basically rewarding 100% of employees. In terms of conditions, bonuses and work tasks are seriously out of touch. In terms of the amount, various companies have ignored their own economic benefits and labor productivity levels, cleverly established names, blindly compared the ratio, so that the distribution of bonuses has reached an uncontrollable point. 2. The effect of bonuses is distorted. The bonus book is flexible and “live”