在对“六经”的认识中,司马迁具体阐述了“六经源于史”的观点。他对“六经”性质的认识接近儒家弟子的观念,而不同于道家的说法。但“六经”并不是他心目中的史书,他明确提出《史记》与《春秋》的区别,《春秋》是借“史”而“言道”的经书,《史记》是载道之“史”,从而在中国古代最早提出了“经史有别”的观念。 In his understanding of the Six Classics, Sima Qian specifically elaborated the view that “the Six Sects originated from history”. His understanding of the nature of the Six Principles approaches the notion of Confucian disciples but differs from Taoist theories. However, the “six classics” is not his history books, he clearly put forward the difference between “Historical Records” and “Spring and Autumn”, “Spring and Autumn” is by “history” and “words” of the Scriptures, “Historical Records” History “, thus earliest in ancient China put forward the concept of” history is different ".