为加强节能管理,我国在出台《节约能源法》的基础上,为进一步规范能效标识的管理,国家发改委和国家质检总局于2004年联合制定了《能效标识管理办法》,确定了我国的能源效率标识的具体实施的新型模式:即“企业自我声明+备案+市场监管”。本期讨论的《节能灯能效标识未备案该如何处理》的案例(以下简称陈文),并对该案如何处理陈述了四种意见。归结起来,陈文中争议的问题可从以下三个焦点——本案中违法主体的认定、质监执法打假的管辖权和对B公司的违法行为认定进而如何处罚进行分析。 In order to strengthen energy-saving management, on the basis of the “Energy Conservation Law”, in order to further standardize the management of energy efficiency labeling, the NDRC and AQSIQ jointly formulated the Measures for the Administration of Energy Labeling in 2004, A new model of concrete implementation of efficiency labeling: “Self-declaration of enterprises + filing + market supervision”. In this issue of “Energy-saving lamp energy-efficiency logo did not record how to deal with” case (hereinafter referred to as Chen Wen), and how to deal with the case stated four views. To sum up, the controversial issue in Chen Wenzhong can be analyzed from the following three focuses: the identification of the illegal subject in this case, the jurisdiction of the quality supervision and law enforcement counterfeiting, and how to punish the illegal behaviors of Company B in turn.