论文部分内容阅读
在基于行为过失而引发医疗损害责任的场合,由于对医生过失的判断采用主观与客观相结合的认定标准,有别于行为故意的判断结果,因此,围绕着医生的注意义务及其违反,其间存在的问题种种,实难分辨和把握。笔者紧密围绕医疗损害责任构成要件中的行为要件展开论述,对医生注意能力的认定以及医生行为过失与否的影响因素进行了深入剖析,通过对医疗过失行为与违法性的逻辑阐述,得出医生违反法律至多只能被作为结论性证据使用这一论断,至于医生的过失行为是否能够最终导致医疗损害责任的承担,还要看医生的行为是否违反了行为适法性的要求。
Where liability for medical damage is caused on the basis of wrongdoing, since the judgment of the doctor’s negligence is based on the combination of subjectivity and objectivity, it is different from the intentional judgment of behavior. Therefore, around the doctor’s duty of care and its violation, There are all kinds of problems that are difficult to distinguish and grasp. The author closely discusses the behavioral elements in the constitutional elements of liability for medical damage, analyzes the factors that determine the doctor’s ability of attention and whether the doctor is negligent or not, and through the logical explanation of the medical negligence and illegality, Violations of the law can at best be used as conclusive evidence to the point that as to whether a doctor’s negligence can ultimately lead to a medical injury liability or not, it also depends on whether the doctor’s conduct violates the requirement of behavioral fitness.