《数学课程标准》指出:“评价的主要目的是为了全面了解学生的数学学习历程,激励学生的学习和改进教师的教学;应建立评价目标多元,评价方法多样的评价体系。”而传统的教学质量评价,以一份试卷、一个分数对学生定高低;以“一分”(平均分)“两率”(优秀率和及格率)定优劣,这种评价方式单一,过分依赖于笔试,夸大试卷在评价中的作用,挫伤了学生 The standard of mathematics curriculum states: “The main purpose of evaluation is to fully understand the students ’math learning process, encourage students to learn and improve teachers’ teaching; to establish evaluation system with multiple evaluation objectives and diverse evaluation methods.” The traditional teaching Quality evaluation, with a test paper, a score of students set high and low; “one point” (average) “two rates” (excellent rate and passing rate) pros and cons, this evaluation method is single, overly dependent on the written examination, Exaggerated papers in the evaluation of the role, contusion students