文献有关夏王帝宁(杼)曾以老丘之地为其都的记载是可信的。从夏王朝的主要活动区域以及属于夏文化的二里头文化分布范围来看,夏都老丘的地望应限定在今河南省境内。今豫西北、豫西、豫南等地不可能是老丘所在,老丘理应在今豫东的开封地区境内。文献有夏都老丘位于开封县陈留镇以北的记载,今开封东北的国都里一带和陈留镇东北的王陈寨一带值得重点关注。王陈寨虎丘岗遗址位置与文献记载较为接近,遗址本身地势较高,范围较大,文化堆积厚,年代早,其为老丘故地的可能性较大。偃师二里头遗址为夏代中晚期的都邑—斟寻,中间未曾中断或废弃。夏都斟寻与老丘并非一都制前提下的前废后兴关系,二者有一定的并存期,前者应为夏王朝中晚期的主都,而老丘则为夏王朝一段时期内的辅都。便于统治和东方军事战争的需要是夏王朝设立老丘辅都的主要原因。 The literature on Xia Di Dianning (杼) who used the land of Laoqiu as its capital is credible. From the main activities of the Xia dynasty and Xia Er Tau cultural distribution of Xia culture, the hope of Xiadu Laoqiu should be limited to the present Henan province. This northwest of Henan, western Henan, Henan and other places can not be where the Laoqiu, Laoqiu should be in this territory of the eastern region of Kaifeng. The literature has Xiadu Laoqiu Kaifeng County in the north of Chenliu town records, this Kaifeng northeast of the capital in the vicinity of Chenliuzhen Wang Chenzhai area worth focusing on. Wang Chenzhai Huqiu Gang site location and the literature records are closer, the site itself is higher, a larger range of cultural accumulation thick, early age, the possibility of Laoqiu is more likely. Yanshi Erlitou site for the middle and late Xia Dynasty Metropolis - Pour search, the middle has not been interrupted or abandoned. Xia Du Pouring and Laoqiu are not one system under the premise of the former waste after emerging relations, both have a certain coexistence period, the former should be the Lord of the Middle and Early Xia Dynasty, while the Lao Qiu Xia Dynasty for a period of time Fudu. The main reason for the establishment of Laoqiu Fudu in the Xia Dynasty was the need to facilitate the rule and the military war in the East.