论文部分内容阅读
目的 通过文献计量学方法评价过去5年(2013至2017年)中国骨关节炎(osteoarthritis,OA)领域的研究现状及热点.方法 在Web of Science核心数据库中,采用普通检索的方式,以“osteoarthritis“为关键词进行主题检索,分析从2013年1月1日至2017年12月31日发表的相关文献.检索截止时间为2018年1月3日.对检出的文献按照作者国家、会议名称、文献类型、作者所属机构、出版年、来源出版物名称等进行索引,并进一步比较中国和美国在发表文章数量、引用次数、h指数以及高被引论文研究方向的差异.使用Excel 2007进行数据分析.结果 在Web of Science核心数据库中,过去5年中国OA领域的年发表文章数量逐渐升高,从2013年的345篇提升到2017年的817篇.中国OA研究发表文章总数和排名居全球第2位,仅次于美国.但中国作者发表文章的平均引用次数和h指数分别为4.08和32,远小于美国的6.26和64.中国高等院校及其附属机构是OA研究的主力机构.OA领域的专业学术期刊和专业学术会议是中国学者投稿的首选.结论 随着我国科研的不断投入,近5年来中国OA领域的科学研究得到了一定的发展,已在国际上占有一席之地,但是在研究影响力、原始创新、政策制定方面还有较大的差距.”,“Objective To evaluate and to identify osteoarthritis (OA) study trends in China based on bibliometrics.Methods To search OA studies in OA research,the Web of Science Core Collection” database was used to search for publication data,which encompassed any published articles published from 2013 to 2017.The keyword “osteoarthritis” was used to identify articles for the purposes of the present study.In order to include all published items,the database was searched using the Basic Search method.The included items were indexed according to countries,document types,organization,publication years and conference titles.The characteristics of OA literatures conducted in China and US were compared in following aspects:h-index,average citation per item,sum of times cited and number of citing articles.Excel software was used for data analysis.Results A total of 2 894 publications on OA in China,published from number of 345 in 2013 to number of 817 in 2017 (with the number of publications increasing annually),were retrieved from the database.While the number of OA studies published by Chinese institutes was ranked second in the world,just after U.S.,the average citation per article and h-index of Chinese studies were far below those of U.S.,scoring at 4.08 versus 6.26 and 32 versus 64 respectively.Universities and its affiliated institutions are the main body of OA research in China.OA researchers in China preferred to publish their studies in specialized journals and conferences.Conclusion Although great advances in OA study are developed in China past 5 years,most efforts are still required to improve our quality,influence and novelty in the field of OA.