论文部分内容阅读
任意性合同法规范所称的任意性,并非是不受限制的,而是有其界限。这是因为任意法中同样体现着法律规定的实质性基本思想,而这种实质性基本思想原则上是不容背离的。此种不容背离的特点即构成格式条款规制上的范式作用:以存有疑义为限,若格式条款违背了法律规定的实质性基本思想,则其不生效力。自始不能情形的积极利益赔偿,合同解除不要求具备应当归责的要件,无谓支出费用的赔偿请求权,以及作为原级履行请求权之延伸的再履行请求权等,均是这一认识的反映。然而范式作用本身亦有其界限,即在满足特定条件的情形,任意法规范的范式作用失其效力,如在因科学或者技术原因而构成自始给付不能的情形,不再赔偿积极利益,而应当赔偿消极利益。
The arbitrary nature of the arbitrary contractual code is not unlimited but has its limits. This is because the arbitrary law also embodies the substantive basic idea stipulated by law, and this substantive basic idea can not be deviated in principle. Such a feature that can not be divorced is the paradigm effect on the regulation of format clauses: to the extent there is doubt, if the format clauses violate the substantive basic ideas stipulated by law, it is ineffective. It is this recognition that the positive benefits of indemnity, the claims of indemnity which do not require due liability and the right of restitution as an extension of the original level of performance claim, reflect. However, the role of the paradigm itself has its own limits. That is to say, the paradigm of an arbitrary law fails its validity when certain conditions are met. If no positive benefits can be compensated because of scientific or technical reasons, Should pay negative benefits.