论文部分内容阅读
人权运动的发展和权利意识的觉醒使人们对司法过程中正义的要求越来越强烈。传统的对程序的价值有着两种近似对立的看法:程序工具主义价值理论和程序本位主义价值理论.随着社会的进步,程序作为一种独立的权利保障方式受到人们日益的关注。程序所具有的约束国家权力扩张和滥用以及促进人们更自觉守法方面的作用,已受到越来越多的学者的认同。但是,诉讼资源的有限性迫使我们努力去寻找能最大化的保障正义实现的程序成本。
The development of the human rights movement and the awakening of the awareness of rights have made people’s demands for justice in the judicial process more and more intense. There are two approximately opposite views on the value of the traditional procedure: the value of procedural instrumentalism and the value theory of procedural self-importance.With the progress of the society, the procedure has been paid more and more attention by people as an independent way of ensuring the rights. The procedure’s role of restraining the expansion and abuse of state power and promoting people’s more consciously abiding by the law has received more and more scholars’ approval. However, the limited resources of litigation force us to work hard to find the procedure cost that can maximize the realization of justice.