论文部分内容阅读
互联网时代,数字图像、视频和数字模型可以很容易地流到工厂,被反向工程化和第三方生产。本文主要对比美国知识产权法,从知识产权的三个重要领域:商标权、专利权和著作权分析网络云中知识产权面临的问题及应对方案。具有实用价值的3D打印模型是否应受商标法保护;以苹果诉三星侵犯其专利权案分析,在我国3D虚拟模型应作为新设计受到专利法保护,同时建立千禧年数字专利法(DMPA)制度;从“独创性”以及“可分性”分析我国虚拟模型的图片或图形作品应当在《著作权法》的范畴内保护。
In the Internet age, digital image, video and digital models can easily flow to the factory, be reverse-engineered, and third-party produced. This article mainly compares the American intellectual property law, from the intellectual property of three important areas: trademark, patent and copyright analysis of the network cloud intellectual property problems and coping solutions. Whether the 3D printing model with practical value should be protected by the trademark law; the patent infringement case analyzed by Apple v. Samsung, the 3D virtual model in our country should be protected by the patent law as a new design and the DMPA should be established at the same time; System; From the “originality” and “separability” analysis of China’s virtual model pictures or graphic works should be in the “Copyright Law” within the scope of protection.