由于没有考虑到垄断侵害、反垄断诉讼与传统民法中的侵权损害、赔偿之诉的重大差异,我国反垄断法草案关于民事赔偿责任的规定缺陷严重,难以实施。法经济学的分析和其他国家与地区的实践均证明,单纯依赖专司机关的行政执法,难以收到理想的反垄断效果。为此,反垄断法应采取惩罚性损害赔偿制度。惩罚的最佳倍率虽难以准确测定,但不妨借鉴美国的三倍损害赔偿立法例,同时根据实践需要,以特别法形式对惩罚性赔偿适用除外的情况作出规定。 Due to the fact that the monopoly infringement, antitrust lawsuit and the traditional civil law infringement damage, compensation for the major differences between the claims, our country’s draft anti-monopoly law civil liability for compensation defects flawed, it is difficult to implement. The analysis of law and economics and the practice of other countries and regions all prove that it is hard to receive the ideal antitrust effect simply by relying on the administrative law enforcement of specialized agencies. Therefore, the antitrust law should adopt a punitive damages system. Although it is difficult to accurately determine the best rate of punishment, it is worth noting that the U.S. legislation on triple damage compensation should be drawn on. In the meantime, exceptions should be made in the form of lex specialis for punitive damages according to practical needs.