论文部分内容阅读
论元结构是任何句法理论都必须讨论的核心问题之一,但论元结构的准确定义和其在句法中所占的地位一直颇具争议,即便在同一种理论框架下,不同学者对论元结构的定义也不尽相同。目前主流生成语法在最简方案的框架下一般将论元结构及论元结构变化操作放在句法层面处理,论元由句法轻动词引入,我们笼统地称之为轻动词理论。这种做法可以有效地减少词库的冗余,符合最简方案的基本思想。国内生成语法学者对汉语复杂的论元配置现象的处理也大多采用轻动词理论的框架,却少有对这股理论大潮的回顾和反思。文章旨在将国外轻动词理论的来龙去脉,以及在此框架下关于论元结构的前沿研究进行详细的评介,以反观轻动词理论的优势及其问题,并加深对动词论元结构的认识。
Argument structure is one of the core issues that must be discussed in any syntactic theory. However, the exact definition of argument structure and its position in syntax have been quite controversial. Even under the same theoretical framework, The definition is not the same. At present, in the framework of the simplest program, the mainstream generation grammar generally puts the operation of the argument structure and the operation of the argument structure on the syntactic level. The argument is introduced by the syntactic light verb, which is generally called the light verb theory. This approach can effectively reduce the redundancy of thesaurus, in line with the basic idea of the simplest plan. Generative grammar scholars have mostly adopted the framework of the light verb theory to handle the complex Chinese Argument Configuration, but few reviews and rethinks the tide of this theory. The purpose of this article is to review the ins and outs of the foreign light verb theory and to provide a detailed review of the frontier research on the structure of the argument in this framework to reflect on the advantages and problems of light verb theory and to deepen our understanding of the structure of the verb argument.