论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察中心静脉导管胸腔闭式引流治疗胸腔积液的临床疗效。方法:选取我院收治的胸腔积液患者156例,分为观察组86例和对照组70例。观察组行中心静脉导管胸腔闭式引流,对照组行胸腔穿刺治疗胸腔积液。2周后观察两组临床疗效和治疗期间发生并发症的情况。结果:观察组治疗总有效率91.9%,明显高于对照组78.6%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率明显低于对照组并发症发生率,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:中心静脉导管胸腔闭式引流治疗胸腔积液的临床疗效明显优于胸腔穿刺治疗的临床疗效,值得在临床上推广使用。
Objective: To observe the clinical effect of central venous catheter thoracic closed drainage in the treatment of pleural effusion. Methods: 156 patients with pleural effusion admitted to our hospital were divided into observation group (86 cases) and control group (70 cases). The observation group received a closed thoracic drainage of the central venous catheter, and the control group received a thoracentesis to treat the pleural effusion. After 2 weeks, clinical efficacy and complications during treatment were observed in both groups. Results: The total effective rate in the observation group was 91.9%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (78.6%). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group. The difference was statistically significant. Significance (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of central venous catheter thoracic closed drainage in the treatment of pleural effusion is significantly better than that of thoracentesis, and it is worthy of clinical application.