论文部分内容阅读
哈贝马斯把马克思的历史唯物主义归结为生产范式,并且认为,此种生产范式所使用的方法过于简单,范畴体系过于单一,对生产力和生产关系之间关系的理解偏向于技术化,因此表现为一种单一的工具性行为活动。同时,此种生产范式在制度系统和教育系统占据头等重要地位的后工业资本主义时期表现为过时。其实,从概念、范畴体系和分析方法来看,马克思的历史唯物主义足以表征为生产范式,它所体现的方法恰恰是一种复杂性方法,不仅蕴含着丰富的范畴体系,而且从多维度、多方面理解社会生产。马克思的生产范式不仅没有过时,反而起着十分重要的作用。
Habermas concludes Marxist historical materialism as a production paradigm and holds that the method used in such a production paradigm is too simplistic and the category system is too simple. The understanding of the relationship between productive forces and relations of production tends to be technical, and therefore Performance as a single tool for sexual activity. At the same time, such a paradigm of production appears obsolete in the post-industrial capitalist period, where institutional and educational systems hold the top priority. In fact, judging from the concepts, category systems and analytical methods, Marx’s historical materialism can be sufficiently characterized as a production paradigm. The method it embodies is precisely a complex method, which not only contains a rich category system but also contains many dimensions, Understand social production in many ways. Not only is the production paradigm of Marx not outdated, it plays a very important role.