类推广泛存在于司法过程之中,但是其核心问题——相似点的判断仍然是难题。作为实践中的优秀案件,指导性案例能够为解决这一难题提供启示。基于权力结构的考虑,公法案件中的类推适用主要发挥辅助作用,而私法案件中,类推则可以发挥主导作用。即使在名义上禁止类推的刑事案件中,也存在着类推的隐性适用。通过研习指导性案例,提升司法者的能力和素质,是类推中相似点的判断及其结论合法性的重要保证。 Analogy widely exists in the judicial process, but its core problem - the judgment of similarities is still a problem. As a good case in practice, the guiding case can provide enlightenment for solving this problem. Based on the consideration of the power structure, the analogy applied in public law cases mainly plays an auxiliary role. In the private law cases, analogy can play a leading role. Even in criminal cases that are nominally banned from analogy, there are implicit applications of analogy. By studying guiding cases and improving the ability and quality of the judiciary, it is an important guarantee for judging the similarities in analogy and the legitimacy of conclusion.