论文部分内容阅读
曾经网路上沸沸扬扬的“肖志军”案已经恢复平静了,但作为一个法律人的思考却仍然让我们沉浸其中,我们在被一个个问题所困扰。我们把眼光投到了这里——《医疗机构管理条例》第三十三条,我们在问,这个一直以来作为医院行为准则的“帝王条款”真的做了“杀人凶手”吗?这个规定背后的真实含义我们是否真的去认真探析过?它将被继续遵守还是被推翻?带着这些问题,我重新读了这个条文。
The “Xiao Zhijun” case, once a hubbub on the Internet, has been restored to calmness. However, thinking as a legal person still keeps us immersed in it. We are being troubled by one issue at a time. We cast our eyes on here - Article 33 of the Regulations on the Administration of Medical Institutions, we are asking, has this “hospitalization rule” really been the “murderer” as a hospital code of conduct? The true meaning behind this rule Do we really go seriously? It will be followed or overthrown? With these questions, I re-read this provision.