父母亲离婚时已获抚养费不影响抚养人死亡时再向侵权人主张

来源 :人民司法 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:aolongjiutian
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】被抚养人的父亲在离婚时已向被抚养人一次性支付抚养费,在抚养人因交通事故身亡时,被抚养人仍有权请求侵权人赔偿被抚养人生活费。案号一审:(2009)甬奉民三初字第574号二审:(2009)浙甬民二终字第645号【案情】原告:廖嘉毅(系死者儿子)。原告:廖嘉诚(系死者儿子)。被告:朱勇。被告:杨绍峰被告:联合保险象山支公司等。浙江省奉化市人民法院经审理查明,原告廖嘉毅、廖嘉诚系死者廖光忠与前妻朱某所生儿子,离婚后由朱某负责抚养。2009年2月16日,廖光忠乘坐的小型客车 [Referee summary] The father of the dependent has already paid the support to the dependents at the time of divorce, and the dependents still have the right to request the infringer to compensate the dependents when the dependents died in an accident. Case No. First Instance: (2009) Yong Feng Min San Chu Zi No. 574 Second instance: (2009) Zhejiang Yong Min Er Zi No. 645 【Case】 Plaintiff: Liao Jiayi (the deceased son). Plaintiff: Liao Jiacheng (the deceased son). Defendant: Zhu Yong. Defendant: Yang Shaofeng Defendant: Joint Insurance Xiangshan Branch and so on. Zhejiang People’s Court found that the plaintiffs Liao Jiayi and Liao Ka-shing were the sons of the deceased, Liao Guangzhong and his ex-wife Zhu. After the divorce, Zhu was responsible for raising him. February 16, 2009, Liao Guangzhong take the small passenger car
其他文献
在立体几何的线面关系中,线面垂直处于核心地位,它是证明线线垂直和面面垂直的纽带,也是计算角度、距离、面积、体积的重要环节,因此线面垂直的证明与应用对于学好立体几何有举足轻重的作用.  例1如图,P为△ABC所在平面外一点,PA⊥平面ABC,∠ABC=90°,AE⊥PB于E,AF⊥PC于F.  求证:(Ⅰ)BC⊥平面PAB;(Ⅱ)AE⊥平面PBC;(Ⅲ)PC⊥平面AEF.  证明(Ⅰ)PA⊥平面AB