捷克作家昆德拉的“中国热”已持续多年,可称得上是一个特殊的文化现象,然而,热的背后我们是否遗忘了某些重要的东西?或者,在何种程度上,我们才能够切近所追崇的东西?“昆德拉现象”值得我们深入地思考。“第二十二条军规”作为黑色幽默的隐喻,不知从何时起,也成为我们难以摆脱的思维怪圈,成了某种无形的力量束缚住我们个性化创新的能力,因此,对文学史叙述中的“第二十二条军规”,确定到了必须破解的时候了。批评是一个连续互动的过程,只有如此,批评才可能走向深入。本刊今年第二期发表了一组关于长篇小说《狼图腾》的文章,引起了读者的广泛关注和深入思考。从人性论的高度,对狼性论提出质疑和批评,对我们在当下文化背景中,重新思考文学艺术创作与人性关怀的关系。无疑具有启发性意义。宋一苇 The “China fever” of the Czech writer Kundera has lasted for many years and can be regarded as a special cultural phenomenon. However, have we forgotten some important things behind the heat? Or, to what extent have we Can we get closer to what we seek? “Kundera phenomenon” deserves our deep consideration. As a metaphor of black humor, the “Twenty-second Military Regulation” has become an irreducible circle of thinking that has become an invisible force to constrain our ability to personalize innovation. Therefore, The “Twenty-second Military Regulation” in the history narration has determined the time that must be solved. Criticism is a continuous and interactive process. Only in this way can criticisms go deeper. This issue of the second issue of this year published a group of articles about the novel “Wolf Totem”, aroused widespread concern readers and in-depth thinking. From the perspective of human nature, the article puts forward the questioning and criticism on the theory of wolfness and rethinks the relationship between the creation of literature and art and the concern for humanity in the present cultural background. Undoubtedly instructive. Song a reed