世间有个规律:能干这一行的就去干了,顾不上吭声,而不干这一行的,反倒在旁边喋喋不休地“分析研究”。我对素描色彩发议论,就属于后者。因为我不教这个。我们的素描、色彩课,半个世纪下来,规律、方法、评判标准似乎明明白白定了型。那为什么这两年里国内越来越多的院校开始“离经叛道”起来?本文的基本内容写于两年前,是为当时基础作业汇报展写的结语。回想两年前,我们凭借“五月苏州”的动力所进行的基础课“改革”,在当时普遍的院校层面上,已属“激进”,与今天的大环境很不一样。当时有人认为这是弄个新鲜玩意儿“卖野人头”,而我的看法是,虽然潮流里也许会夹带这些因素,但就基础课改革的主流、主体而言,实在是经过严肃思考后的行动。 There is a law in the world: able to do this line to go dry, do not attend to say anything, and do not do this line, on the contrary chatter endless “analysis.” I talk about the color sketch, it belongs to the latter. Because I do not teach this. Our sketches, color classes, half a century down, the law, methods, judging criteria seems to be plainly typed. That is why in the past two years more and more institutions in China began to “deviate”? The basic content of this article was written two years ago, is the result of the basic work report written conclusion. Looking back two years ago, the basic course “reform,” which we conducted with the motivation of “May in Suzhou,” was a “radical” at the then general academic level and was very different from today’s environment. At that time, some people thought it was a fresh move to “sell savages.” My view is that although the trend may contain these factors, the main and main aspects of the reform are indeed the result of serious thinking .