论文部分内容阅读
新《民事诉讼法》第65条是关于举证期限的规定,举证期限同证据失权有着密切的关系,逾期举证最严重的后果就是证据失效。我国民事诉讼举证时限制度几经变革,从证据随时提出主义到严格提出主义直至今天的柔性提出主义,到底哪一种模式更适合中国司法现状引发了学术界的广泛争议。作为决定案件胜负的证据的一道准入门槛,证据失权制度将走向何处,具有重大的研究价值。
Article 65 of the new Code of Civil Procedure provides for the period of proof, and the period of evidence is closely related to the loss of evidence. The most serious consequence of overdue proof is the failure of evidence. After many changes in the time limit of civil procedure of evidence in civil litigation, from the proposition of evidence to the flexible proposition of strict proposition until today, which model is more suitable for the present situation of Chinese judicature has aroused widespread controversy in academia. As an entry barrier to the evidence that determines the outcome of the case, the system of evidence loss of authority will go where and have great research value.