论文部分内容阅读
我们试图对康德以来的普遍历史观念稍作评论。这种反思的前提是从普遍历史的过去视角以及在实践上规划好的未来的视角看来的对全球性现状的思考,其中的任何一方面,都不是试图通过指出可怕的后果或者任何其他方式,为人类恐怖的非人道行为的历史记录进行辩护。首先通过对发展的思想中什么是活的、什么是死的这个问题的回答,对18世纪和19世纪早期的历史哲学作一些反思;其次,对历史哲学中的“进步的辩证法”及其后关于社会变革的一般理论提出某些思考,并对“进步”的成本和收益有一个更加清楚的认识;最后,从上述的批判历史反思的视角来对全球现代性的当代话语稍作评论。
We try to make a brief comment on the universal historical conception since Kant. This reflection is based on the reflection of the global situation from the perspective of the past of the past as a whole and from the perspective of a planned future in practice, neither of which is intended to seek, by pointing out the terrible consequences or any other means , To defend the history of inhuman acts of horror. First, we make some reflections on the philosophy of history in the 18th and early 19th centuries by answering the question of what is living and what is dead in our thinking on development. Secondly, we make some reflections on the philosophy of history in the philosophy of history and Later, some general thoughts on social change were put forward and a clearer understanding of the costs and benefits of “progress” was made. Finally, from the perspective of critical historical reflection above, the contemporary discourse of global modernity was slightly overlooked Comment