论文部分内容阅读
陆勇案的出现是现有制度性语境的产物,它在刑法上的处理困境揭示的是法律的形式逻辑与实质的价值判断之间的冲突。对于陆勇案或类似案件而言,在现行刑法体系中,至少存在六种可能的去罪化路径。通过适当的法解释,此类案件完全可以得到妥当的解决。对陆勇案刑法困境及其出路的探讨,给予人们四点启示:一是体系化的思考有助于提高刑法适用的质量;二是刑法解释中不可固守先前理解;三是刑法解释不应回避实质的价值判断;四是有必要通过灵活运用解释技术来拉近刑法解释中的应然与实然。
The emergence of Lu Yong case is the product of the existing institutional context. Its treatment of the dilemma in the criminal law reveals the conflict between the formal logic of law and the substantive value judgment. For the case of Lu Yong or a similar case, there are at least six possible path of decontamination in the current criminal law system. By appropriate legal interpretation, such cases can be properly resolved. On the case of Lu Yong case of criminal law and its outlet, to give people four points of inspiration: First, systematic thinking helps to improve the quality of the application of criminal law; second criminal law can not be defied prior interpretation; Third, the interpretation of criminal law should not be avoided Real value judgments; Fourth, it is necessary to narrow the gap between the interpretation of criminal law through the flexible use of interpretation techniques.