与清代阮元主编的《经籍籑诂》相比,2003年集体编撰出版的《故训汇纂》,在编排格式、检索便利、资料详备等方面,都有进步与创新。但我们不能因此而脱离历史实际去苛责阮元和他主编的《经籍籑诂》,甚至否定《经籍籑诂》的开创之功,以致对学术风气和学界后辈造成不良影响与误导。 Compared with the “Jingjiujiu” edited by Ruan Yuan in the Qing Dynasty, the Compilation and Compilation of Ancient Books compiled and published in 2003 has made progress and innovation in terms of layout format, retrieval convenience and detailed materials. However, we should not therefore criticize Ruan Yuan and his “classics and writings” as the historical practice, or even deny the pioneering work of “classics and journals”, which has adversely affected and mislead academic traditions and academics.