论文部分内容阅读
目的了解目前各医院病案装订技术,为改进病案装订技术提供依据。方法于2009年8月至2010年2月,采用电话调查的方法对本市78家二级、三级医院的病案装订技术进行调查,调查的装订技术主要包括线绳装订、订书机装订、半自动装订机装订、全自动装订一体机等,然后就几种装订技术固定效果、装订速度、费用、对病案保管和使用的影响等进行比较。结果得到64家医院的调查资料。线绳装订占42%,订书机装订占23%,全自动装订机占13%。几种装订技术对病案使用的影响没有明显的区别;在装订速度上订书机装订最快,线绳装订最慢;固定效果以装订机最佳。结论几种装订技术均在使用,各有利弊,病案装订技术需要不断改进。
Objective To understand the current medical record binding technology in hospitals and provide the basis for improving medical record binding technology. Methods From August 2009 to February 2010, telephone interviewing methods were used to investigate the medical records binding technology of 78 second and third level hospitals in our city. The investigation of binding technology mainly included wire binding, stapler binding, semi-automatic Binding machine binding, automatic binding one machine, etc., and then several binding technology fixed effects, binding speed, cost, the record keeping and use of the impact of such comparison. The results obtained from 64 hospitals survey data. 42% wire binding, binding stapler 23%, automatic binding machine accounted for 13%. There are no obvious differences between several stapling technologies on the use of the medical records. The staplers are the fastest on the binding speed and the slowest on the binding of the bindings; the best is the binding effect on the binding machine. Conclusion Several binding technologies are in use, each has its own advantages and disadvantages, medical record binding technology needs continuous improvement.