论关系契约理论的困境

来源 :私法 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:shenglove5
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
近代以来的契约法依次经历了以下三个理论阶段:古典契约法理论、新古典契约法理论和现代契约法理论。关系契约理论是契约法社会化浪潮的理论成果,旨在解决关系性契约难题,是古典契约法“死亡”后有关市场交换之法理建构中最有前途的理论选择。但由于关系契约理论承继了法社会学研究方法的弱点,导致它不管是理论上还是实务上都存在诸多难以克服的困境,比如理论不周延、无法建构关系契约法、对司法审判价值不大等。西方先进契约法理论为中国契约法治的现代化提供了参考,也预设了限度和难度。 Since the modern contract law has gone through the following three stages: the theory of classical contract law, the theory of neoclassical contract law and modern contract law theory. The theory of contractual relationship is the theoretical result of the socialization tide of contract law and aims to solve the problem of relational contract. It is the most promising theoretical choice in the legal construction of market exchange after classical contract law “death ”. However, since the theory of contract of contract inherits the weaknesses of the research methods of legal sociology, it leads to many insurmountable dilemmas both in theory and in practice. For example, the theory is not extended, the relationship-contract law can not be constructed, the value of judicial adjudication is not so great . The theory of advanced contract law in the West provides a reference for the modernization of the Chinese contract law and also prescribes limits and difficulties.
其他文献
中央教育科学研究所基础课程教育研究部、广西师范大学出版社、广西师范大学杂志社联合举办“英语四格漫画”征稿评选活动。
《侵权责任法》颁行后,学界就该法中何为侵权责任的一般条款,争议颇多。在问题类型上,侵权责任一般条款的争议属于立法技术问题,不存在对错之分,仅有优劣之别。侵权责任的一
对损害赔偿和费用承担的有效主张不仅对中国法院成功实施知识产权法甚为关键,也成为外国投资者能够克服在华研发投资风险的一个重要理由。论文首先介绍了知识产权侵权损害赔