论文部分内容阅读
本文认为,“严打”政策是宽严相济刑事政策的下位政策,是宽严相济刑事政策在严重的社会治安形势下所起作用的必然结果,其必须以宽严相济的刑事政策为指导。“坦白从宽,抗拒从严”政策是一项法官量刑政策,而非侦查抑或其它政策。这是因为,从宽从严只应由法官根据客观事实进行判定,在侦查或其它程序中不存在从宽从严的可能性。未成年人刑事政策要受到宽严相济刑事政策的指导,属于下位刑事政策,体现了宽严相济刑事政策的主旨,虽然其侧重于宽大这一方面,但惩办的一面不可偏废。
This article holds that the “crackdown” policy is a subordinate policy of the criminal policy of temper justice with mercy and is the inevitable result of the criminal policy of both leniency and strict in the serious social order. It must be guided by the criminal policy of tempering justice with mercy. “Frankly lenient, resist strict ” policy is a judge sentencing policy, rather than investigation or other policies. This is because, being lenient and strict should only be judged by the judge on the basis of objective facts and there is no possibility of being lenient in investigation or other proceedings. The criminal policy of minors should be guided by the criminal policy of strict auspiciousness and belong to the criminal policy of the lower level, which embodies the thrust of the criminal policy of strict and leniency. Although it focuses on leniency, the penalty side must not be neglected.