论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨腹腔镜脾切除术围术期康复护理的应用效果。方法选择我院收治的30例腹腔镜脾切除术患者,随机分为两组,对照组接受常规护理,观察组接受围手术期康复护理,比较两组围手术期护理效果。结果 (1)观察组平均排气时间(1.2±0.2)d,住院费用(1.9±0.3)万,住院时间(1 5.8±2.1)d;对照组平均排气时间(2.1±0.5)d,住院费用(2.4±0.5)万,住院时间(19.5±1.5)d,组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)观察组满意14例,满意度为93.3%,对照组满意11例,满意度为73.3%,组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组1例患者出现并发症,几率为6.7%,对照组5例患者出现并发症,几率为33.3%,组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜脾切除术围术期康复护理的应用效果显著,值得临床推广。
Objective To investigate the effect of perioperative rehabilitation nursing of laparoscopic splenectomy. Methods Thirty cases of laparoscopic splenectomy admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into two groups. The control group received routine nursing. The observation group received perioperative rehabilitation nursing. The perioperative nursing effect was compared between the two groups. Results The average discharge time of the observation group was (1.2 ± 0.2) d, the hospitalization cost was 1.9 ± 0.3 million and the hospitalization time was (1. 5.8 ± 2.1) days. The mean discharge time of the control group was (2.1 ± 0.5) days and hospitalization Costs (2.4 ± 0.5) million, hospital stay (19.5 ± 1.5) d, the difference between groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). (2) In the observation group, 14 patients were satisfied, the satisfaction rate was 93.3%, the control group was satisfied with 11 patients and the satisfaction rate was 73.3%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Complications were observed in 1 patient in observation group with a probability of 6.7%. Complications were found in 5 patients in control group with a probability of 33.3%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic splenectomy perioperative rehabilitation nursing effect is significant, worthy of clinical promotion.