论文部分内容阅读
奈格里基于工人主义和自主主义的理论传统,以政治性—主体性的逻辑构架,从历史理论的客观主义范式回归革命主体性话语,从结构转向主体。由此,他将列宁思想的发展史重组为工人阶级不断摆脱外在的政治调解和组织模式进而获取自身充足性和自主性的主体性生产过程,并以当代资本主义生产方式的“后福特制”转型为现实基础,把列宁思想当代化地塑造为建基于新革命主体性模式的生产和共产主义解放规划的激进政治。从本质上看,这种重构逻辑试图走出纯粹结构层面的客观历史分析,使阶级关系彻底摆脱生产力与生产关系矛盾运动的客观必然性模式,恢复阶级斗争在历史运行中的中心地位,但因过度简化社会转型的动力机制和过分偏执于革命主体性视域,不可避免地摇摆在唯物主义与唯意志论之间,并带有强烈的审美乌托邦和相对主义色彩。
Based on the theoretical tradition of workers and autonomy, Negli returns to the subjective discourse of revolution from the objectivist paradigm of historical theory and from the structure to the subject with a political-subjective logical framework. Thus, he reorganized the history of the development of Lenin’s thought as the subjective process of the working class’s continuous removal from the external political mediation and organization modes and its acquisition of its own sufficiency and autonomy. In the light of contemporary capitalist mode of production, System, "transforming Lenin’s thinking into a realistic reality and shaping it into a radical politics based on the new revolutionary subjective model of production and communist emancipation planning. In essence, this kind of reconstruction logic attempts to get out of the objective historical analysis at the purely structural level, so as to completely free the class relations from the objective inevitability model of the contradiction between the productive forces and the relations of production and restore the central position of the class struggle in historical operations. However, The impetus to simplify the social transformation and the excessive paranoia in the revolutionary subjectivity are inevitably swaying between materialism and voluntarism with a strong aesthetic utopia and relativism.