“马克思—恩格斯”关系已经不能仅仅以“文本”对抗“文本”的方式来反驳,因为论争的双方都能够在经典中寻找到理论支撑。如何走出这种论争的困境,如何真正找出论争的目的,这些问题在乔·诺瓦克那里进行了客观的清理。在他看来,“对立论”思想逻辑的根本之处,是一致地对马克思主义哲学理解中“共同持有的辩证唯物主义原则”开火。然后他分别从本体论、认识论、辩证法以及历史观四个方面给予了佐证。他在整个清理的过程中,始终贯穿着科学与政治性原则,以此反击“对立论”。这一点,将给“马克思—恩格斯”关系一个客观的结论,即这种“对立论”并不是一种历史的真实存在,而是富有政治意图偏见的虚构。 The “Marx-Engels” relationship can no longer be rebutted simply by confronting “text ” as the two sides of the debate can find theoretical support in the classics. How to get out of the plight of this debate, how to really find out the purpose of the dispute, these issues were objectively cleared in Joe Novak. In his view, the essential point of the logic of opposition to the ideology is to openly fire on the principle of dialectical materialism jointly held by Marxist philosophical understanding. Then he gave evidence from four aspects: ontology, epistemology, dialectics and history. Throughout the entire process of clean-up, he consistently runs through the principles of science and politics in response to the “oppositionism.” This point will give an objective conclusion to the relationship between Marx and Engels that this kind of “oppositionism” is not a historical existence but a fiction with a political bias.