论文部分内容阅读
在对“李约瑟之谜”进行重新定义的基础上,本文从文化约束、产权约束、发明模式、地理禀赋、人地比例五个角度解释了“李约瑟之谜”。本文认为,传统儒教文化不利于科技革命发生;明代以来对私人产权保护的侵害不利于工业革命发生;以经验为基础的科技发明模式不利于现代科技产生;我国古代末期市镇发展模式阻碍规模效益发挥,最终无法孕育工业革命;内生于古代中国要素禀赋的“劳动消耗型”技术进步方式阻碍了工业革命的发生。
Based on the redefinition of “Joseph Needham”, this paper explains the “Joseph Needham Mystery” from the perspectives of cultural restraint, property rights restraint, invention mode, geographical endowment and man-land ratio. This article argues that the traditional Confucianism culture is not conducive to the revolution of science and technology; since the Ming Dynasty, the violation of the protection of private property rights is not conducive to the occurrence of the industrial revolution; experience-based mode of invention of science and technology is not conducive to the emergence of modern science and technology; In the end, the industrial revolution can not be conceived. The “labor-consuming” technology endogenous to the ancient Chinese factor endowments has hindered the industrial revolution.