论文部分内容阅读
通过对《药品管理法》中按劣药论处的两种情形:擅自添加着色剂、防腐剂、香料矫味剂及辅料;其他不符合药品标准规定的在进行处罚通知时,不需载明药品检验机构的质量检验结果。笔者认为上述两种情形仅凭直观无法断定,均须相应的人员、设备、科学的方法通过物理、化学或仪器进行技术分析,准确、科学地定性,实事求是地记载原始检验记录才能反应药品的质量。从依法行政(依据合法、证据确凿充分、程序合法等)方面做出详细论处。
Through the “Drug Administration Law” in accordance with the inferior situation in two cases: the unauthorized addition of colorants, preservatives, flavoring and excipients; other does not meet the standards of drugs in the notification of punishment, do not need to specify drugs Inspection agency quality inspection results. The author believes that the above two situations can not be conclusively determined by intuition only. All personnel, equipment and scientific methods need to conduct technical analysis through physical, chemical or instrumental methods, accurately and scientifically, and truthfully and truthfully record the original test records in order to reflect the quality of the drugs . From the administration according to law (based on lawful, well-documented, procedural law, etc.) to make a detailed discussion.