明人对“诗史”之说的辨证 ,大体上是在三个层面上展开的 :一、从“诗贵情思而轻事实”的角度表示对杜甫“博涉世故”的不满 ;二、从叙事技巧的角度论证杜甫并非惟一当得起“诗史”之称的诗人 ;三、从是否真实可信的角度对杜甫提出批评。杜甫因其巨大影响而被选中作为剖析的标本 ,成为明人辨证的核心 ,目的却是对整个中国古典诗加以反省 ,摆脱“诗史”观念的强有力束缚 The dialectic of Ming Dynasty’s theory of “history of the poem” is generally carried out on three levels: First, it expresses its dissatisfaction with Du Fu’s “poem-related” from the perspective of “Shi Ji Gui Qing Si Si Min Shi Shi Shi”; Second, From a technical point of view, Du Fu is not the only poet who can afford the title of “History of Poetry”. Third, he criticizes Du Fu from the perspective of being authentic and credible. Because of his great influence, Du Fu was selected as the specimen for analysis and became the core of the Ming dialect. The purpose was to reflect on the entire Chinese classical poetry and to get rid of the strong bondage of the concept of “history of poetry”