静态的所指与灵动的象征——读余纪教授《电影符号学置疑》有感

来源 :铜仁职业技术学院学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:shenzhiying
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
符号学具有理性的稳定性,因此它擅长研究影像中一个个单独的画面,如果把影视艺术的声音和时空加进去,电影符号学往往力不从心。人们对电影符号学“能指”和“所指”或“陈述”与“话语”的理解只是对影像中一幅幅静态画面的理解,电影毕竟是流动的时空、声画艺术,与其说人们用符号学中的“能指”“所指”来理解整部影片背后的文化意义,其实已经超出了符号学使用的范围,不如说是靠隐喻象征来理解影视作品更为恰当。 Semiotics has a rational stability, so it is good at studying a separate image in the video, if you add the sound and space of film and television arts, film semiotics often powerless. People’s understanding of cinematics, “signifier” and “signified” or “stating” and “discourse” is only an understanding of the still images in the images. After all, the movie is a flowing space-time Instead of understanding the cultural meanings of the whole movie with “” signifier "in semiotics, it is beyond the scope of semiology, rather than metaphor Symbol to understand the film and television works more appropriate.
其他文献