时至今日,由经过严格专业训练的学者写的现代建筑史著作已经蔚为大观了,而现代建筑创立者的真实言论和思想却少见记录。为了理解这些大师及其作品,旁观者的评价和看法固然重要,当局者的所思所言更是不可或缺。比较而言,前者更为严谨和专业,学术性强,后者相对轻松和随意,趣味性浓。口述历史不是新鲜事,人类所有的历史最初都是由口述来传承的。然而在录音设备出现之前,前人的声音是没有办法保存下来的。正如历史学家威廉·莫 Today, the writings of modern architectural history written by highly trained scholars have become spectacular, while the real words and ideas of the founders of modern architecture are rarely recorded. In order to understand these masters and their works, the appraisals and opinions of the spectators are of course important. What the authorities think and think is even more indispensable. In comparison, the former is more rigorous and professional, highly academic, which is relatively easy and casual, fun concentration. Oral history is not new, and all human history was originally dictated by words. However, before the advent of recording equipment, the voice of the previous person is no way to save it. Just as historian William Moe