论文部分内容阅读
2006年4月19日,全国首例民政局作为原告为无名流浪汉索赔一案在南京高淳发生,随后,全国多个省市纷纷效仿,并在高淳案结案之前胜诉,而久拖8个多月之后,高淳县民政局一审败诉,二审法院维持原判。这是一个注定引起争议的案件,因为它似乎使得“撞死人白撞”看上去具有了正当性;根据调查数据显示,仅南京、杭州、宜昌等城市,每年都有20-30年起交通事故无法确认死者身份,这说明流浪汉被撞、需要维权不再是个案,本文旨在对其进行制度层面上的相关探讨。
On April 19, 2006, the first Civil Affairs Bureau of China, as plaintiff, claimed that it was an innocent homeless man in Gaochun, Nanjing. Subsequently, many provinces and cities in China successively followed suit and won a long time of more than 8 wins Months later, Gaochun County Civil Affairs Bureau lost the first instance, the court of second instance upheld the original verdict. This is a case that is doomed to controversy because it seems to make it “justified” by “killing a man”; according to the survey data, cities such as Nanjing, Hangzhou and Yichang have 20-30 years each year Traffic accident can not confirm the deceased’s identity, indicating that the tramp was hit, the need for rights is no longer a case, this article aims to its institutional level of the relevant discussions.