《成吉思汗评传》严格讲来,应放到历史学的范围内加以评判。因此,我常想一个问题:史家研究历史人物,能够保持独立品格,不受任何意识形态影响,完全以求得历史的真相为撰写目标吗?我们知道,某些学者是把传统的历史考证学说成是只重证据而不讲理论的,这恐怕是种误解。远不说,就以? “Criticism of Genghis Khan,” strictly speaking, should be placed within the scope of history to be judged. Therefore, I often think of a question: Are historians studying historical figures capable of maintaining their independent character and being free from any ideological influence and completely targeting the truth of history? As we know, some scholars refer to the traditional theory of historical textual research It is a kind of misunderstanding that as far as evidence is concerned, theory is not theoretical. Far from speaking, to?