论文部分内容阅读
克拉申(Krashen)的五个假说是具有广泛争议的。本文通过对五个假说的分析和评价,得出的结论最具有争议性的是输入假说,它缺乏定义的恰当性和解释的功效性。基于Kaplan的理论评价模型,其他的几个假说也是可争论的。基于克拉申的情感过滤假说的启示,在二语教学过程中,教师们必须意识到他们的责任除了语言教学本身之外,还需要重视学生的情感因素,在教学过程中减少学生的焦虑,并激发学生的学习热情和动机,增强他们的自信心,不可忽视的是,批判式思维的价值需要在课堂教学中得到体现。
The five hypotheses of Krashen are widely disputed. Through the analysis and evaluation of the five hypotheses, the most controversial conclusion drawn in this paper is the input hypothesis, which lacks the validity of the definition and the effectiveness of the explanation. Based on Kaplan’s theory of evaluation models, several other hypotheses are arguable. Based on the Krashen’s theory of affective filtration hypothesis, in the process of second language teaching, teachers must be aware of their responsibilities besides language teaching itself, and also attach importance to students ’affective factors and reduce students’ anxiety during teaching Inspire students’ learning enthusiasm and motivation to enhance their self-confidence, can not be ignored is that the value of critical thinking needs to be reflected in the classroom teaching.