在现代风险社会中,合规致害现象广泛存在。合规情节能否成为特殊侵权责任的抗辩事由这一重大的理论和实务问题,却因为处于私法和公法交叉的边缘地带而未得到足够重视。本文从一起环境损害赔偿案例切入,反思环境法学界通说的理据,考察我国实在法秩序上的真相,在此基础上借鉴日本公害法上的忍受限度论,提出在风险规制领域,认定合规致害行为人的特殊侵权责任时应当适当考虑合规情节,并运用类型化技术分别讨论了合规情节在不同情形下的权重。 In modern risk-based society, the phenomenon of compliance is widespread. However, this major theoretical and practical issue of whether a compliance plot can be the defensive cause of a special tort liability has not been paid enough attention because it is at the fringe of the intersection of private law and public law. This article from a case of compensation for environmental damages, reflecting on the environmental law scholars say the truth, the reality of our country to review the truth of the law, on this basis, drawing on Japan's toleration limits on the law of public nuisance, proposed in the area of ​​risk regulation, identified compliance The victim's special tort liability should give due consideration to the compliance circumstances, and use the typing technique to discuss the weight of the compliance episode in different situations respectively.