论文部分内容阅读
在诺曼征服时期,英格兰的本土圣徒遭到了诺曼人修道院长的质疑,以娄勒斯、埃德蒙德主教为代表的学者最先把这一现象看作是征服者与被征服者之间民族文化的冲突。利雅得等学者研究了圣徒与修道院之间相互依赖的关系,以及诺曼征服之后岛上宗教日历变动情况,认为当时本土圣徒遭受的质疑没有明显的民族歧视色彩。从公元11-12世纪欧洲经院哲学发展,理性思想萌芽的时代背景来看,这种质疑行为实则是基督教学者在理性思维的驱动下对身份模糊的旧时代圣徒提出的合理怀疑。
During the Norman Conquest, England’s native saints were questioned by the Norman monastery chief. Scholars represented by Loules, Bishop Edmond, were the first to view the phenomenon as a conqueror and conqueror The conflict between ethnic cultures. Riyadh and other scholars studied the interdependent relationship between saints and monasteries and the change of religious calendar on the island after Norman conquest, arguing that there was no obvious ethnic discrimination when the indigenous saints were questioned. From the background of the development of European scholasticism and the sprout of rational thought from the 11th to the 12th century adulteration in Europe, this kind of questioning is actually a reasonable suspicion raised by Christians under the guidance of rational thinking toward the vague old saints.