论文部分内容阅读
我国2012年《民事诉讼法》修改后民事证据制度有了较大的改变,进一步增加了证据的种类,并调整证据的排序,但电子证据的鉴定、地位仍值得商榷,特别是在当前信息技术飞速发展的当下,电子证据真实性、鉴定难度越来越大。新《民事诉讼法》对电子证据在什么情况下属于紧急情况,证据所在地,被申请人驻地,如何保全等都无明确的界定,不利于电子证据的诉前保全。
China’s 2012 Civil Procedure Law revised the civil evidence system has changed a lot, further increasing the types of evidence, and adjusting the ranking of evidence, but the identification of electronic evidence, status is still debatable, especially in the current information technology The rapid development of the moment, the authenticity of electronic evidence, the identification of more and more difficult. The new Code of Civil Procedure has no clear definition of the circumstances under which electronic evidence is an emergency, where the evidence is located, how the respondent resides and how to preserve it, which is not conducive to the preservation of electronic evidence.