论文部分内容阅读
花生栽培种的分类在植物学与农艺学的科学研究与生产上均有很重要的地位,分类系统恰当与否与遗传、育种及农艺学等学科均有很密切关系.自二十世纪初这一工作开始引起许多学者注意,至五十年代以来有了较普遍的发展.由于各研究者所掌握的材料及学术观点不同,提出了各有特点的分类方案,如美国、日本、苏联、印度、坦桑尼亚、阿根廷等国的研究者都提出花生栽培种分类系统报告.自1956年以来我国的学者提出了几个分类方案,但至今尚未取得统一意见,而在南北两区的农业大专学校教材中,各自写入了不同的分类系统.这问题亟待通过研究解决.
The classification of peanut cultivars plays an important role in the scientific research and production of botany and agronomy. Whether the classification system is appropriate or not is closely related to disciplines such as genetics, breeding and agronomy. Since the early twentieth century The work began to attract the attention of many scholars and enjoyed a more general development since the 1950s.Due to the different material and academic perspectives held by researchers, various classification schemes have been proposed, such as the United States, Japan, the Soviet Union, India , Tanzania, Argentina and other countries have put forward the report of peanut cultivar classification system.Chinese scholars have proposed several classification schemes since 1956, but so far no unified opinion has been reached yet, but in the textbooks of agricultural colleges and universities in the two regions , Each written in a different classification system.This problem needs to be resolved through research.