中国文学批评一向重视风格 ,一部中国文学批评史几乎可以说就是文学风格的批评史 ,但是 ,在这种重视文艺风格的文艺批评史里 ,却找不到批评家及其批评风格应有的位置。只有“风格批评”而缺乏“批评风格”。为什么文艺批评的风格研究会成为理论上的空白呢 ?这个问题既与文艺理论对批评认识的偏差有关 ,也与文艺批评自身的特点有关。 Chinese literary criticism has always attached great importance to style. A history of Chinese literary criticism can be said to be almost a history of literary criticism. However, in the history of literary and artistic criticism that emphasizes literary style, no critic and critic style should be found position. Only “style criticism” lacks “critical style.” Why does the study of the style of literary criticism become a theoretical blank? This issue is not only related to the deviation of criticism of literary theory, but also to the characteristics of literary criticism itself.