论文部分内容阅读
目的检验军人情景特质应对方式量表的信度和效度。方法采用随机整群抽样法抽取903名军人,以军人情景特质应对方式量表进行测评,并对其中110名官兵同时测量中国军人心理健康量表(CMMHS)。利用统计软件对军人情景特质应对方式量表进行信度、效度检验。结果①总量表Cronbach′sα系数为0.806,分量表Cronbach′sα系数为0.723-0.805(P<0.01);总量表分半信度为0.808,各因子的分半信度为0.694-0.899(P<0.01);②量表各因子之间及与总分之间相关系数为0.719-0.912(P<0.01);③探索性因素分析结果显示,此研究结果与原量表各条目的因子归类一致;④验证性因素分析发现,拟合指标χ2值=5298.3,塔克-刘易斯指数、比较拟合指数、增值拟合指数、拟合优度指数分别0.929、0.926、0.927、0.910。结论经本次检验证明,军人情景特质应对方式量表信度和效度都较好,达到了心理测量学标准,能够作为测量军人情景特质应对方式的有效工具。
Objective To test the reliability and validity of the scale of Coping Styles of Soldiers. Methods A total of 903 military personnel were sampled by random cluster sampling method and evaluated by means of the military situational coping style scale. 110 officers and men simultaneously measured the Chinese Mental Health Scale (CMMHS). Using the statistical software to test the reliability and validity of the measures of coping style of military personnel. Results ① The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the total scale was 0.806, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the subscale was 0.723-0.805 (P <0.01); the semi-reliability of the total scale was 0.808, the semi-reliability of each factor was 0.694-0.899 (P <0.01); ②The correlation coefficient between each factor of the scale and the total score was 0.719-0.912 (P <0.01); ③The results of exploratory factor analysis showed that the results of this research were in good agreement with those of the original scale The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2 value of fitting index was 5298.3, Tuck-Lewis index, comparison fit index, value added fitness index and goodness-of-fit index were 0.929, 0.926, 0.927, 0.910 respectively. Conclusions This test proves that the reliability and validity of the scale of coping style of servicemen in the military are good and meet the standards of psychometrics, which can be used as an effective tool to measure the coping style of military personnel.