A View Of Young Goodman Brown From Frye's Theories Of Symbolism

来源 :读与写(教育教学刊) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:CBN_cntjlz
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
Herman Nothrop Frye was a famous Canadian literary critic and theorist. According to him, symbol was :“Any unit of any literary structure that can be isolated for critical attention.” He partitioned literary symbolism into five levels or phases. Each phase independently possessed its own mythos, ethos, and dianoia. These phases were: Symbol as motif; Symbol as sign; Symbol as image; Symbol as archetype and symbol as monad. This paper tries to apply his theories of symbolism to the comment of Young Goodman Brown, one of the best short stories written by the American romantic writer Nathaniel Hawthorne. Herman Nothrop Frye was a famous Canadian literary critic and theorist. According to him, symbol was: “Any unit of any literary structure that can be isolated for critical attention. ” He partitioned literary symbolism into five levels or phases. Each phase independently This as were sign as its own mythos, ethos, and dianoia. These phases were: Symbol as motif; Symbol as sign; Symbol as image; Symbol as archetype and symbol as monad. This paper tries to apply his theories of symbolism to the comment of Young Goodman Brown , one of the best short stories written by the American romantic writer Nathaniel Hawthorne.
其他文献
A Rose for Emily is one of William Faulkner’s most famous short stories. This paper aims to analyze those unique narrative skills in this short story and shows