论文部分内容阅读
对同一文学史实在不同的文学史著述中可能有很大的反差,包括发展线索、动力、走向等等各有不同表述,这就是文学史的“错位”。文章分为四部分来论述:首先,价值评定中的错位,对于作品价值、作家地位,根据不同的文学观念有不同的认识。其次,在文学发展中的影响关系有不同梳理,形成错位。再次,由于所参照的对象不同,有比较视角下的错位。最后,造成错位的其他方面的原因,以及文学史的续写的思考。
There may be great contrasts between literary history writings which are actually different in the same literary history, including the development of clues, motivation, and direction, which are the “wrong places” in literary history. The article is divided into four parts to discuss: First of all, the dislocation in the valuation of the value of the work, the writer’s status, according to different literary concepts have different understanding. Second, there are different sorts of relations in the development of literature, forming a dislocation. Thirdly, due to the different objects of reference, there is a comparative misunderstanding. Finally, the reasons for the other aspects of the dislocation, as well as the continuation of literature history thinking.