1983年结束独裁统治后的阿根廷重新走上了民主政治的道路,政党再度成为阿根廷政治生活的主体。但民主宪政的回归并没有相应地促成政党政治的制度化,先后上台执政的激进党和正义党均不同程度地陷入治理危机的泥潭。究其根源,一个重要的原因是阿根廷两大传统政党内部的治理缺陷(如政党的运动主义倾向、独立性差、缺乏党内共识、支持基础薄弱、联邦制度带来的不利影响,等等)。内部治理的失败使阿根廷政党没有真正发挥政府和社会之间的媒介作用,丧失了政党的基本职能——表达民众的利益,其结果迫使民众常常诉诸于体制外的社会动员或街头抗议等形式来表达自身的利益要求,造成社会政治动荡频发。 After the cessation of dictatorship in 1983, Argentina returned to the path of democratic politics and parties once again became the mainstay of the political life in Argentina. However, the return of democratic constitutionalism did not correspondingly lead to the institutionalization of party politics. The radical parties and the just parties that took power on their own shoulders are, in varying degrees, caught in the quagmire of governance crisis. An important reason for this is the lack of governance within the two traditional political parties in Argentina (such as the pro-independence tendency of political parties, the lack of consensus within the party, the weak foundation of support, the negative impact of the federal system, etc.). The failure of internal governance caused the Argentine political parties not to really play the role of a medium between the government and society and to lose the basic functions of political parties - to express the interests of the general public. As a result, the public were often forced to resort to forms of social mobilization or street protests outside the system To express their own interests, resulting in frequent social and political turmoil.