在刑事案件审查起诉阶段对案件审查结果的准确性把握,都建立在对全案证据认真审查的基础之上,对证据的真伪进行甄别,在各证据间相互对照和比较,其所反应的事实能否相互印证,以追求我国刑事诉讼法确立的“案件事实清楚、证据确实充分”。在诸多的案卷材料中,以言词证据居多,而犯罪嫌疑人的供述与辩解(狭义上的口供)又因其身份和地位的特殊性,对其真实性与稳定性的审查较为困难,所以在积极找寻有效的口供真实性审查方法的同时,我们又要减少对口供的依赖,削弱口供在刑事案件定罪量刑中的地位和重要性,积极转变审查证据模式,取得审查起诉阶段的主动性。 The accuracy of the case examination results in the stage of criminal prosecution and prosecution is based on the careful examination of the evidence in the whole case, the authenticity of the evidence is screened, and the evidences are compared and compared with each other. Facts can confirm each other in pursuit of China’s criminal procedure law established “The facts of the case clear, the evidence is indeed ”. In many case files, most of the testimony is verbal evidence. However, the confession and excuse of criminal suspects (in the narrow sense) are also more difficult to examine their authenticity and stability because of their special status and status. At the same time, we must reduce the reliance on confessions, weakened the status and importance of confessions in criminal conviction and sentencing, and actively changed the mode of examining evidence to obtain the initiative of examining and prosecuting prosecutions.