论文部分内容阅读
目的 评价肌力协调抗荷训练对高性能战斗机飞行员和歼击机飞行员的抗 G效果。 方法 对象为 44名高性能战斗机飞行员和 99名歼击机飞行员。高性能战斗机飞行员初训后经 2次复训 ,歼击机飞行员均为初训。肌力协调抗荷训练按训练大纲实施 ,训练前后测试做习惯的和规范的抗荷动作时的各项参数 ,推算 +GZ耐力进行比较。 结果 与训练前习惯抗荷动作相比 ,两组训练后规范抗荷动作时的大腿、小腿肌静力和维持时间增加 ,均有显著性意义 (P<0 .0 5 ) ;规范抗荷动作时的收缩压 (SBP)与基础值相比 ,高性能战斗机飞行员 SBP增加 5 1.8± 10 .3m m Hg,估算 G耐力增加2 .8± 0 .7G,歼击机飞行员 SBP增加 46 .0± 13.2 m m Hg,G耐力增加 2 .6± 0 .7G,差异均有显著性意义 (P <0 .0 1)。高性能战斗机飞行员复训未达标率为 2 7.2 7% ,歼击机飞行员初训未达标率为48.48% ,差异有显著性意义 (P<0 .0 5 )。 结论 肌力协调抗荷训练 G防护效果有效 ,且复训明显好于初训。建议歼击机飞行员也进行复训
Objective To evaluate the anti-G effect of muscle strength coordinated anti-stress training on high-performance fighter pilots and fighter pilots. Methods for the 44 high-performance fighter pilots and 99 fighter pilots. High-performance fighter pilots after initial training after 2 recurrent training, fighter pilots are the first training. Strength coordination of anti-Dutch training implementation according to the training program, testing before and after the test to do the customary and normative anti-Dutch act of the parameters, calculate + GZ endurance comparison. Results Compared with the pre-training habitual anti-charge action, both the static force and the maintenance time of the thigh and calf in the standard anti-charge action after training were significantly increased (P <0.05); the standard anti-charge action Systolic blood pressure (SBP) Compared with the baseline, SBF for high performance fighter pilots increased by 5 1.8 ± 10 .3 m Hg, estimated G endurance increased by 2. 8 ± 0 .7 G, and fighter pilot SBP increased by 46 .0 ± 13.2 mm Hg, G endurance increased by 2.6 ± 0.7G, the difference was significant (P <0.01). The non-compliance rate of high-performance fighter pilots training was 2 7.27%, and that of fighter pilots was 48.48%, the difference was significant (P <0. 05). Conclusion Muscle strength anti-Dutch training G protective effect is effective, and recurrent training was significantly better than the initial training. Fighter pilots are also recommended for recurrent training