论文部分内容阅读
解构主义思潮渗透到法学研究领域形成蔓延了法学的“解构”运动。西方法学的“解构”运动与其说是语言学、哲学以及文学批评理论的外部刺激,更不如说是法学之内的反思积累的支持的结果。法学的“解构”运动拆卸了宏大法律话语、消解了法学中的“二元对立”观念并在此基础上颠覆了法学的“中心主义”等级观念,大大拓展了法学研究的领域和视野,使法学研究出现了多元趋势;但另一方面,解构主义思潮的怀疑主义倾向也给法学研究带来一些负面影响,具有元批评性质的解构主义法学研究缺乏实践指导性,没有方法论的意义。
Deconstruction ideological infiltration into the field of jurisprudence to form a spread of jurisprudence “deconstruction ” movement. The “deconstruction” movement of Western jurisprudence is not so much the external stimulus of linguistics, philosophy and literary criticism as it is the result of the accumulation of support for reflection within jurisprudence. The “deconstruction” of law disassembles the grand legal discourse, dissolves the concept of “dual opposition” in jurisprudence and on this basis subverts the notion of “centralism” of jurisprudence and greatly expands the study of law On the other hand, the tendency of skepticism in deconstructionism also brought some negative effects on legal research. The study on deconstruction legalism with meta-criticism lacks practical guidance and does not have The significance of methodology.